In my January 15 blog posting entitled Rule 23(g) Standard For Attorney Conduct, I incorrectly characterized the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals’ description of the alleged misconduct of Bock & Hatch, class counsel in Creative Montessori v. Ashford Gear. In fact, the District Court on remand, ultimately determined that any alleged misconduct by the firm was "not so significant as to cast serious doubt on counsels’ ability to represent the class loyally," and approved the firm as class counsel. I apologize to Bock & Hatch for this error.
↧
